The Left is Not Right

The left is going to lose why because they attack McCain on his strengths instead of his weaknesses. I don't feel sorry for them, they played "Identity Politics" with the highest office in the land at stake and look where it has gotten them...I keep hearing the self comforting talk on the news cable programs...oh the Democrats will pull together when the nominee is choosen NO they won't and the Leadership is talking about June and I think the animosity is so intense now it is to late for humpty dumpty to be put back together again. They talk about Obama being tripped up again I think there is a "situation" already lined up it is all about timing. Still she has votes and he has delegates..says alot doesn't it "this isn't what is best for the Dem Party or the Country" This is about POWER grabbing.
Hillary Clinton is not going to drop out of the Democratic race. We all know she's not going anywhere. She just won the Pennsylvania primary (clobbering you, I might add). She's got some momentum now, has won the big, industrial states, and has new life to her fundraising.

Barack Obama, the Preacher and the Terrorist

Obama was not a church going man and he was told by his organizers that in order to gain credibilty that he had to not just join a church but GO TO CHURCH. So he went around looking for a church. And there were black churches that had no use for him since he wanted to deal with community efforts that combined black churches with synagogues and Catholic churches. Black churches wanted nothing to do with that But then he found the Doctor Reverand Jeremiah Wright.”Trinity was for "Buppies"--black urban professionals--and didn't have enough street cred. But Wright was a former Muslim and black nationalist who had studied at Howard and Chicago, and Trinity's guiding principles--what the church calls the "Black Value System"--included a "Disavowal of the Pursuit of Middleclassness.'"“ Yes, you read that right. The New Republic in 2007 said that Wright was a former Muslim of the Nation of Islam type. In 1991 Obama came back to Chicago (after Harvard) served on the boards of both the Woods Fund and the Joyce Foundation, which also gives grants to Alinsky-style groups, and continued to teach organizing workshops. In 2001, the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN, for which Khalidi's wife, Mona, serves as president. The Fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002. Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund's website. According to tax filings, Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2000. Obama served on the Wood's Fund board alongside William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971. Ayers, who still serves on the Woods Fund board, contributed $200 to Obama's senatorial campaign fund and has served on panels with Obama at numerous public speaking engagements. Ayers admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. governmental buildings in the 1970s. He is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The $40,000 grant from Obama's Woods Fund to the AAAN constituted about a fifth of the Arab group's reported grants for 2001, according to tax filings obtained by WND. The $35,000 Woods Fund grant in 2002 also constituted about one-fifth of AAAN's reported grants for that year. The AAAN, headquartered in the heart of Chicago's Palestinian immigrant community, describes itself as working to "empower Chicago-area Arab immigrants and Arab Americans through the combined strategies of community organizing, advocacy, education and social services, leadership development, and forging productive relationships with other communities.

Again, to reiterate, Barack Obama is not the soft spoken messianic candidate that he appears to be. And if you actually delve into the New Republic article, you’ll see he’s no different than Hillary Clinton, both will do whatever it takes to win. But the big question is which baggage do you want entering the White House, the one who we already know or the one with Muslim and terrorist connections?

Hillary is a jungle animal who would eat her young to win

Hillary's morals alone disqualify her from becoming President. She is a jungle animal who would eat her young if it gave her what she desired. Her values of win at all costs even to ensuring that McCain would win against Obama is way beyond the pale. Just step back for a minute and imagine a democrat - a candidate for the democratic party stating , not once, not twice but many times that the Republican candidate is prepared to be president but your fellow democrat conetnder is not - just because he is leading you in the nomination contests. And since she would be willing to have him on her ticket as vice president shows how devious and cynical a game she is playing with her party's chances. This shows a distinct lack of values, morals and poor judgement. having set all that out, what argument would she use against John McCain. All he needs to do is keep showing the clips of her endorsing him as being ready for the job. Plus he has tons more real and relevant experience than her.

Obama Aide: Bill Clinton Is Like Joe McCarthy

Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign is trying to clarify comments by former President Clinton that seemed to question Barack Obama's patriotism—comments an Obama aide likened to Joseph McCarthy.
Clinton's campaign said the comments were being misinterpreted and quickly posted a clarification on its Web site. But retired Air Force Gen. Merrill "Tony" McPeak said he was disappointed by the comments and compared them to those of McCarthy, the 1950s communist-hunting senator.
The former president made the comments while speculating about a general election between his wife and Republican John McCain.
"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country," said Clinton, who was speaking to a group of veterans Friday in Charlotte, N.C. "And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."
McPeak, a former chief of staff of the Air Force and currently a co- chair of Obama's presidential campaign, said that sounded like McCarthy.
"I grew up, I was going to college when Joe McCarthy was accusing good Americans of being traitors, so I've had enough of it," McPeak said.
Clinton campaign spokesman Phil Singer rejected the comparison.
"To liken these comments to McCarthyism is absurd," Singer said. He said McPeak was "clearly misinterpreting" the remarks and suggested that might be an intentional effort to divert attention from a recent controversy involving controversial statements by Obama's former pastor.
In a posting on Hillary Rodham Clinton's Web site Friday, the campaign said the former president was simply talking about the need to keep the race focused on issues, "rather than falsely questioning any candidate's patriotism."
McPeak, who served under Clinton and the first President Bush, was skeptical.
"It's a use of language as a disguised insult. We've seen this before, this little clever spin that's put on stuff," McPeak said. "I have no idea what his intentions are, but I'm disappointed in the statement. I think Bill Clinton is, or ought to be, better than that."
The former president has attracted criticism over earlier comments during the heated Democratic primary race. Following South Carolina's primary in January, he was accused of fanning racial tensions for appearing to cast Obama as little more than a black candidate popular in state with a heavily black electorate.
He also criticized the news media for making a race story out of his comments.

Obama plans to make major race speech tomorrow (Tuesday)

Obama doesn't need to address the "larger issues of race" in a speech, he needs to address the SPECIFIC relationship with Rev. Wright. In all his interviews on this topic, he has repudiated the comments, but sidestepped most questions about his specific associations/relationship with Rev. Wright. By sidestepping the specific issues to speak in generalities he will accomplish nothing!

Super-delegate tally remains slippery

While Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama wage an intense contest to win the support of "super delegates" who may decide the party's nomination, getting an exact count of those elected officials and party insiders depends on the day of week. Vacancies, deaths, elections and even moving from one state to another can alter the super-delegate rolls. Consider New York. Lt. Gov. David Paterson, is already a super delegate
Comments:According to this article Paterson had committed to Hillary, but let's see if that holds. The new Muslim elected Tuesday in Indianapolis is a superdelegate too.
This election they just might have have that little bit of hypocrisy shoved right down their throats. Just like the communists and tyrants they idolize, they keep a backup plan to make sure the "democratic" process provided the correct result, whether the people want it or not. Big Government always knows whats best for the people, no need to endanger that for something as silly as democracy.. The People's Democratic Party isn't so much the people's...is it?

Barack Obama has won the Texas Democratic Caucuses

Barack Obama has won the Texas Democratic caucuses and will get more delegates out of the state than his rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton, who won the state's primary, according to CNN estimates. Under the Texas Democratic Party's complex delegate selection plan, Texas voters participated in both a primary and caucuses on March 4. Two-thirds of the state's 193 delegates were at stake at the primary, while the remaining third were decided by the caucuses. An additional 35 superdelegates were not tied to either contest.

Yep, she (or is it he?) is a loser again. She can no longer claim she won Texas, unless she wants to lie some more. And that is getting harder and harder to do, now that it is clear that she is trying to emulate bubba in the lying category. Her campaign ship is foundering, but is not yet sunk.